SUCCESS STORY

Window Installation

SFE Attorney: Paul Sheely

Plaintiff Attorney: Robert O’Halloran, Anthony Rafel

City, County, State: Washington Circuit Court, Oregon

Claims Alleged: Construction Defect

Injuries Alleged: Construction Defect

Admitted Liability: No

Amount Claimed: $7,000,000+

Brief Overview

Window installation has been a large source of litigation in the construction defect practice in the general Portland area over the past several years. In this case, attorney Paul Sheely successfully defended a subcontractor during a 5 week trial that took place in Washington County.

The Background

Paul represented a framing subcontractor who was involved in the installation of over 1,000 windows at a condominium project in Beaverton, Oregon. The building consisted of over 40 units. The plaintiffs’ attorney targeted the framing subcontractor alleging improper installation of the windows. The case is further complicated by numerous different parties named, bankruptcy, and early settlement of only one party. The alleged defects in the siding and windows was causing water and moisture to enter the homes.

Paul, through his use of experts and convincing evidence, persuaded the jury that his client had conformed to proper construction practices and adhered to the guidelines set out by the developer and general contractor.

Plaintiffs Theme

Plaintiffs’ main contention was the defects which allegedly caused moisture intrusion and consisted of deficient deck drainage systems. As proof, plaintiff offered evidence from inspections they had completed of more than 50 of the 1,100 windows.

Our Strategy

Paul’s trial team set out to demonstrate that his client did in fact install the windows properly, as they had thousands of times before this project. Paul convinced the jury that the window installers installed the windows in accordance with sound construction principles and in a manner directed by the developer and general contractor.

The Outcome

The jury returned a verdict for less than one-tenth of the amount sought by the developers. Needless to say, this was a huge victory for Paul and his client.

Read More
Securing Victory Under Securities Laws Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Research Pays Off (to the Tune of $2.2 Million) Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Drawing the (Property) Line Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Multi-National Retailer’s Discrimination Mitigated Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Allegations of Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Employment Law Violations? Denied. Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , Rejected: A Desperate Attempt to Recover Expenses Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , An $18,000,000 Dismissal Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , The Early Bird Gets the Case Dismissed Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Safe Harbor Letter , Preparation Always Pays off: Especially at Trial Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , The Case of the Mysterious Torn Medial Meniscus Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Hit and Run Dismissed Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Admitting Liability and Saving Costs Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Moreau v. Samalin , A Swift and Speedy Settlement Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Know Your Venue: Taking Advantage of Arbitration Rules to Gain the Upper Hand and Mitigate Costs Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , Pre-Existing Conditions Affirmed, No Additional Recovery Earned Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Dog Bite Dilemma Friday December 20, 2019 By: Cliff Wilson
Let’s talk

Tell us about your legal challenge.
Then we’ll tell you how we can help.