SUCCESS STORY

Hit and Run Dismissed

Claims Alleged: Automotive Accident: Hit and Run

Injuries Alleged: Lost Wages and Medical Treatment

Amount Claimed: $53,000

The Overview

Smith Freed Eberhard used the fruits of intensive discovery efforts to convince a plaintiff attorney to dismiss his case with prejudice.

The Background

In a motor vehicle accident case, the driver of a car (the plaintiff) filed suit against the driver of another car (the defendant) claiming that he rear-ended her while she was stopped at an intersection. The plaintiff alleged that the reason he rear-ended her was because the defendant failed to stop for the overhead red traffic signal. The plaintiff sought damages in excess of $53,000 dollars which included lost wages and months of medical treatment.

The Strategy

Smith Freed Eberhard was asked to represent the defendant and their insurance company. The defendant claimed that the real reason why he rear-ended the plaintiff was because he was rear-ended by a hit and run driver, causing his car to be pushed into the plaintiff’s car. The defense tried to obtain a dismissal of her client stating that the unknown hit and run driver should be the one held negligent, not her client, but the plaintiff’s counsel refused.

We responded by taking an aggressive stance on discovery and obtained a 911 call that was made by her client’s passenger which proved that there was in fact a hit and run driver. They also obtained the plaintiff’s medical records which contained statements from the plaintiff admitting that there was a hit and run driver that caused the accident.

The Outcome

After presenting this evidence to the plaintiff’s counsel, he agreed to dismiss the case entirely with prejudice. The insurance company and insured owed nothing to the plaintiff and both clients were extremely happy with the outcome.

Read More
Securing Victory Under Securities Laws Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Research Pays Off (to the Tune of $2.2 Million) Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Drawing the (Property) Line Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , , Multi-National Retailer’s Discrimination Mitigated Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , Allegations of Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Employment Law Violations? Denied. Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , Rejected: A Desperate Attempt to Recover Expenses Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , An $18,000,000 Dismissal Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , The Early Bird Gets the Case Dismissed Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Safe Harbor Letter , Preparation Always Pays off: Especially at Trial Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , The Case of the Mysterious Torn Medial Meniscus Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Hit and Run Dismissed Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Admitting Liability and Saving Costs Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Moreau v. Samalin , A Swift and Speedy Settlement Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Know Your Venue: Taking Advantage of Arbitration Rules to Gain the Upper Hand and Mitigate Costs Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, , Pre-Existing Conditions Affirmed, No Additional Recovery Earned Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
, Dog Bite Dilemma Friday December 20, 2019 By: Firm Authorship
Let’s talk

Tell us about your legal challenge.
Then we’ll tell you how we can help.