Practice Area
UM/UIM
Oregon Supreme Court Allows UM/UIM Stacking Among Multiple Policies Issued by Same Insurer
Podcast
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode, Cliff…
Read more »
Wednesday October 20, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
Oregon Supreme Court Allows UM/UIM Stacking Among Multiple Policies Issued by Same Insurer
Legal Alert
From the Desk of Cliff J. Wilson:  In this case, the Oregon Supreme Court determined that an anti-stacking provision in an uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) policy was unenforceable, holding that any attempt to limit the amount of UM/UIM coverage from multiple applicable…
Read more »
Tuesday October 19, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
Beware the Fine Print: Washington Court of Appeals Strikes a Trial De Novo Because the Client Failed to Sign
Legal Alert
From the Desk of Gordon C. Klug: In Hanson v. Luna-Ramirez, the Washington Court of Appeals ruled on whether an attorney’s signature to a request for trial de novo was sufficient under SCCAR 7.1. Claims Pointer:  Under the new version…
Read more »
Thursday October 14, 2021 By: Gordon Klug
The Third Time’s the Charm. Oregon Supreme Court Examines Wright III to Explain the Difference Between Fault and Causation in an Underinsured Motorist Claim
Podcast
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode, Cliff…
Read more »
Thursday September 30, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
The Third Time’s the Charm. Oregon Supreme Court Examines Wright III to Explain the Difference Between Fault and Causation in an Underinsured Motorist Claim
Legal Alert
Listen to Our Legal Alerts on the Following Platforms: From the Desk of Cliff J. Wilson: The Oregon Supreme Court got two bites of the apple in the case of Wright v. Turner. In a second appeal to the Oregon…
Read more »
Thursday September 30, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
Is UIM Coverage for Claimants in Insured Vehicles on the Horizon in Oregon?
Legal Alert
Listen to Our Legal Alerts on the Following Platforms: From the desk of Cliff Wilson: Insurance carriers have historically been allowed to exclude UIM coverage for injury damages of occupants in an “insured vehicle.”  Oregon Courts have repeatedly applied the…
Read more »
Monday July 5, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
If you Sail Out of the Safe Harbor, Expect to Pay the Price (in Attorney Fees)
Legal Alert
From the desk of Cliff Wilson: In disputes over insurance policies, there is the potential that the insured can recover attorney fees from the insurer. However, when the dispute is over uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits, the insurer can protect…
Read more »
Wednesday April 28, 2021 By: Cliff Wilson
UIM Benefits for Non-Relative Passenger? Denied!
Legal Alert
From the desk of Cliff J. Wilson: The Washington Court of Appeals recently revisited the public policy lens as related to UIM exclusions in Washington automobile insurance policies.  In this case, the court examined Progressive’s decision to deny UIM benefits…
Read more »
Wednesday December 30, 2020 By: Cliff Wilson
Insurers Are Afforded Safe Harbor Protection From Attorney Fees Even if the Insured Claims that the Insurer’s Failure to Settle was Unreasonable or in Bad Faith
Legal Alert
From the desk of Josh Hayward: In UM and UIM claims, attorney fees may be recoverable by the insured. However, there is a statutory safe harbor provision that prevents an insured from being awarded fees if certain criteria are met.…
Read more »
Thursday November 19, 2020 By: Josh Hayward
Oregon Court of Appeals Confirms that Plaintiffs Have the Burden to Prove Damages Should be Allocated in Multiple Accident Scenarios
Legal Alert
From the desk of Cliff Wilson: The one constant in litigation is that the Plaintiff carries the burden to prove every element of their case.  In complex scenarios, however, sometimes Plaintiffs will argue to push their burden on to the…
Read more »
Thursday November 12, 2020 By: Cliff Wilson
Oregon Personal Lines – 2020 Year in Review
Webinar
Smith Freed Eberhard Partners Josh Hayward and Cliff Wilson discuss major Personal Lines cases of the past year in Oregon with a focus on the impact these cases will have on Personal Lines claims management. In this hour-long webinar presentation,…
Read more »
Friday October 23, 2020 By: Josh Hayward
Oregon Court of Appeals determines whether an insurance company can allege comparative fault in a UIM claim and still enjoy the protection of its safe harbor letter.
Legal Alert
From the desk of Joshua P. Hayward: To avoid attorney’s fees in a UIM case, an insurer must agree to binding arbitration and limit the issues to the liability of the uninsured/underinsured motorist and damages. If a proper safe harbor letter…
Read more »
Thursday September 17, 2020 By: Josh Hayward
Oregon Court of Appeals Determines That PIP/Health Insurance Reimbursement Statutes Apply to a Company That Contracted to Serve as a Third-Party Administrator for the Oregon Public Employees Benefits Board (PEBB)
Legal Alert
From the desk of Jeff Eberhard: Health plan contracts may provide broad rights that an injured plaintiff must repay any liability and/or UIM payments received.  If Oregon PIP/health insurance statutes are applied, the likelihood of repayment is much less.  However, as the Oregon Court of Appeals recently found, the activities of…
Read more »
Thursday July 16, 2020 By: Jeff Eberhard
Top 10 Things to Know About Discovery in the Information Age
White Paper
  Whether or not you viewed our webinar, Discovery in the Information Age, you'll want to download our complimentary cheat sheet that summarizes the key takeaways from the webinar about how you can better use technology to more effectively defend…
Read more »
Tuesday November 26, 2019 By: Jeff Eberhard
Oregon Case Update: Oregon Supreme Court Restricts the Scope of Discoverable Communications Between Plaintiffs and Treating Physicians
Legal Alert
Oregon Case Update: Oregon Supreme Court Restricts the Scope of Discoverable Communications Between Plaintiffs and Treating Physicians  From the Desk of Ryan McLellan: Communications between plaintiffs and their treating physicians have long been discoverable in Oregon depositions after the plaintiff has…
Read more »
Thursday December 6, 2018 By: Cliff Wilson
Attorney Fee Exposure in UM/UIM
Webinar
The Scariest Thing This Halloween— Attorney Fee Exposure in UM/UIM Smith Freed Eberhard Partner, Cliff Wilson provides an overview and discussion on minimizing the risk of attorney fees in first party UM/UIM claims.  In this hour-long Webinar presentation, Cliff will…
Read more »
Friday October 5, 2018 By: Cliff Wilson
Oregon Case Law Update: Insurer’s Safe Harbor Letter Insufficient to Express Consent to Binding Arbitration
Legal Alert
Oregon Case Law Update: Insurer’s Safe Harbor Letter Insufficient to Express Consent to Binding Arbitration From the Desk of Joshua P. Hayward: ORS 742.061(1) entitles a first-party plaintiff to attorney fees if the plaintiff’s ultimate recovery exceeds the amount previously tendered…
Read more »
Thursday July 12, 2018 By: Josh Hayward
Recent Posts
  • Steve Murphy Joins Smith Freed Eberhard as Associate Attorney Please join us in welcoming Steve Murphy! Steve has joined…
  • Jeremy Miller Joins Smith Freed Eberhard as Associate Attorney Please join us in welcoming Jeremy Miller! Jeremy has joined…
  • Meet Narmina Sharifova, Our Newest Associate Attorney at Smith Freed Eberhard Please join us in welcoming Narmina Sharifova! Narmina is based…