Commercial Lines in Washington: 2022 Year in Review
Webinar
Join Smith Freed Eberhard Partners, Kyle Riley and Ashley Nagrodski, as they discuss significant commercial lines cases from 2022 in Washington with a focus on the impact these cases will have on commercial lines claims management. Watch The Recording Watch…
Read more »
Wednesday May 10, 2023
By: Firm Authorship
When Can a Claimant Sue a Retailer In Lieu of a Product Manufacturer and Who Has The Burden Proof Under the Washington Products Liability Act (“WPLA”)?
Legal Alert
From the Desk of Brian Schiewe: The WPLA limits when a retailer of a product can be sued in lieu of the product’s manufacturer. These statutory conditions generally turn on whether the plaintiff can prove that the chances of collecting…
Read more »
Wednesday January 18, 2023
By: Brian Schiewe
Washington Supreme Court Asked to Recognize an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine
Legal Alert
The learned intermediary doctrine has been a part of Washington law since its adoption in 1978. This doctrine protects manufacturers of prescription drugs from liability as long as the manufacturers adequately warn the prescribing physician of the dangers and risks…
Read more »
Monday August 1, 2022
By: Firm Authorship
One Defendant’s Negligence is Another Defendant’s Treasure
Legal Alert
From the Desk of Brian Schiewe: Proximate cause is an essential element to a negligence claim and can be hard to prove in asbestos-related cases. Thus, the jury instructions on causation are extremely important in making, or from a defendant’s…
Read more »
Monday July 11, 2022
By: Brian Schiewe
What is Deception and When Does It Cause Injury?
Legal Alert
The Washington Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) was enacted to protect consumers from “unfair and deceptive acts or practices” occurring in trade or commerce. While a plaintiff does not have to prove an act or practice was intended to deceive, only…
Read more »
Wednesday May 18, 2022
By: Firm Authorship
Two Experts, One Reasonable Conclusion: Washington Court of Appeals Grants Summary Judgment Despite Competing Expert Opinions
Legal Alert
In general, summary judgment is not appropriate when two experts offer competing evidence. In a product defect case, it is the trier of fact that has to consider the competing evidence and determine if the product was unsafe to an…
Read more »
Thursday May 12, 2022
By: Firm Authorship
Oregon Product Liability Law
Webinar
Join Smith Freed Eberhard Partners Josh Hayward and Sean Conner as they share their expertise and experience with product liability cases in Oregon. Watch The Recording Enter your email below to request more information on this webinar. > Why Watch…
Read more »
Thursday January 20, 2022
By: Josh Hayward
Have You or A Loved One Been Exposed to Damages Inconsistent with the Pleading?
Podcast
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news. In this week's episode Melanie…
Read more »
Wednesday January 5, 2022
By: Melanie Rose
Have You or A Loved One Been Exposed to Damages Inconsistent with the Pleading?
Legal Alert
From the Desk of Melanie Rose: This product liability case addressed the burden of proof imposed on plaintiffs’ as well as defendants’ responsibility to catch and clarify inconsistencies within the pleadings. In examining this asbestos case, the Oregon Court of…
Read more »
Wednesday January 5, 2022
By: Melanie Rose
Washington Commercial Lines – 2020 Year in Review
Webinar
Smith Freed Eberhard partner Kyle Riley discusses significant cases of the past year in Washington, with a focus on commercial lines claims management. Watch The Recording Enter your email below to request more information on this webinar. > Why Watch…
Read more »
Friday April 2, 2021
By: Kyle Riley
Oregon Case Update: Oregon Supreme Court Determines that the Noneconomic Damages Cap Does Not Apply in Any Case Involving Workers’ Compensation
Legal Alert
Oregon Case Update: Oregon Supreme Court Determines that the Noneconomic Damages Cap Does Not Apply in Any Case Involving Workers’ Compensation From the Desk of Ryan McLellan: Oregon’s $500,000 noneconomic damages cap purports to limit the amount of noneconomic damages…
Read more »
Thursday April 25, 2019
By: Ryan McLellan
2018 – Year In Review – Commercial Lines in Oregon
Webinar
Watch The Recording Enter your email below to request more information on this webinar. > Smith Freed Eberhard Partner Bill Taaffe discusses major cases of the past year in Oregon. In this one hour presentation, Bill focuses on the following…
Read more »
Thursday November 8, 2018
By: William Taaffe
