Jeffrey Eberhard
Managing Partner
Expertise Overview

With a career spanning over 30 years, successfully representing a wide range of clients in complex and high profile cases, Managing Partner Jeff Eberhard is a recognizable and reputable force within the industry.

Jeff’s practice focuses on civil litigation throughout Oregon and Washington with an emphasis on the defense of complex liability claims, most notably, in dram shop/liquor liability. By successfully defending hundreds of cases, Jeff’s expert knowledge of Oregon’s Dram Shop Act, and how to defend against it, is unparalleled.

Relevant Cases

In Deckard v. Bunch – the most significant liquor liability case decided in the last 20 years – the Oregon Supreme Court cited extensively to Jeff’s amicus curiae brief, which detailed more than 35 years of legislative history of Oregon’s Dram Shop Act. The court ultimately adopted Jeff’s position that the legislature intended the Dram Shop Act to shield commercial alcohol providers from liability, thus rejecting the position of the entire plaintiffs’ bar (and the court of appeals) that the Dram Shop Act had created a new, plaintiff-friendly “statutory liability” claim, and bringing much-needed clarity to this area of law.

In two subsequent, unrelated cases – Mason v. BCK Corporation and Balzer v. Moore – Jeff was able to secure summary judgment on all claims against his clients under the complicity doctrine of the Dram Shop Act. In each case, the plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries after leaving a tavern as a passenger in another patron’s vehicle. In both cases, the court ruled in Jeff’s client’s favor, finding that as a matter of law the plaintiff could not recover when he had substantially contributed to that driver’s intoxication – not by buying alcohol, but instead by drinking with the driver at the tavern. The plaintiff in each case has appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals, where Jeff continues to represent his clients.

In Shields v. Enterprise Leasing Company, Jeff established new law in that a self-insured rental car company does have to provide liability insurance to a renter. The court ultimately held in Shields that the Financial Responsibility Act did not require a self-insured rental car company to provide minimum third-party liability coverage. The trial court also properly dismissed the Bad Faith and Consumer Protection Act claims.


George Washington University, M.P.S., Law Firm Management, 2010
Willamette University College of Law, Certificate in Dispute Resolution, J.D., 1987
University of Oregon, B.S., Finance and Political Science, 1984

Professional Certification & Accolades

Member, Oregon State Bar Association
Member, Washington State Bar Association
Oregon Super Lawyer - 2006 - 2020
Top 50 Oregon Super Lawyer - 2013, 2015
Best Lawyers in America - 2011 - 2021
NITA Master Advocate
Past Board Member, Oregon Association of Defense Counsel
Member, Council on Litigation Management
Admitted, United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Admitted, United States District Court for the District of Western Washington
Black Belt Trial Advocacy Training Program

Practice Areas
  • Practice Area
    • Commercial Liability Defense
    • Negligence
    • Trucking & Transportation
    • Products Liability
    • Slip and Fall
    • Timber Trespass
    • Tenant Landlord
    • Premises Liability
    • Jobsite Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Dram Shop & Tavern Keeper
    • Personal Lines
    • First & Third Party / SIU
    • Professional Lines (EPL,D&O,E&O)
    • Construction & Development
Bar Admissions
  • Oregon
  • Washington
Success Story When to Fight Back with a Counterclaim Thursday November 19, 2020 By: Jeff Eberhard
Success Story Road Rage Rebuttal Thursday June 18, 2015 By: Jeff Eberhard
Legal Alert Don’t Have the Evidence? What Happens if You Pretend To? Monday March 22, 2021 By: Jeff Eberhard
Let’s Talk

Tell me about your legal challenge.
Then we’ll tell you how we can help.

*Form secured with reCAPTCHA